Tendo City

Full Version: Capcom would have been totally fine with Mega Man in SSBB
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
http://kotaku.com/5046537/why-no-mega+ma...k-nintendo

Turns out Nintendo never asked. Maybe it was just an issue of dealing with all the characters they had to work with.

Shame though, maybe next time.
Mega Man in SSBB would have been cool.
Nintendo: *8 years later* Oh wait, no wait, dude... I just got it.

Microsoft: wut

Nintendo: You could download more characters... AFTER buying the game.

Microsoft: yeh

Nintendo: Adding replay value.

Microsoft: ok

Nintendo: ...so what are you up to?

Microsoft: We have enough people online to start a small land war with China.

Nintendo: oh ...Wanna download Megaman for $5.00?

Microsoft: hay

Nintendo: Yeah?

Microsoft: Hey.

Nintendo: Yeah.

Microsoft: No.
Ahaha! That's... sadly accurate...

Well at any rate, Nintendo has recently announced an upcoming solution to the hard disk problem. ...That sounded menacing...

The thing is, the 360 sales have been jumping up ever since that price drop in Japan. At this rate, Nintendo may need to start paying attention. Also, it appears 360s don't randomly decide to stop working any more.
Yeah... maybe in eight years Nintendo will figure out the concept of "patches" and "addon downloads", maybe... if they decide to.

Of course, that would require things like "a storage solution with actual space on it", so they couldn't do it right now...

Quote:Well at any rate, Nintendo has recently announced an upcoming solution to the hard disk problem. ...That sounded menacing...

They've been saying that for a while now I think, with no results. My expectations are minimal at this point. I hope they do... but with how long it's been, I don't know if they will anytime soon.

Quote:The thing is, the 360 sales have been jumping up ever since that price drop in Japan. At this rate, Nintendo may need to start paying attention. Also, it appears 360s don't randomly decide to stop working any more.

This is true. Last week, the 360 even managed to beat the Wii in sales in Japan (not the DS, though, that outsold the Wii and 360 combined), while the PS3 trailed far behind. It's still well behind in last there, but if this bounce can last, pushed by Infinite Undiscovery, Tales of Vesperia, and Star Ocean 4 (and The Last Remnant before the PS3), it would be interesting... that certainly is a good lineup that should draw people, and it clearly has, to some extent.

Nobody should forget, though, that the DS won this console generation years ago. The rest of it's just a battle for second place (which the Wii is winning handily, despite the 360's quite nice boost in sales thanks to the long, long-awaited real price drop). :)
It also helps that FFXIII is no longer PS3 exclusive, making Sony lose a serious bullet point. At this point there's Metal Gear Solid 4, White Knight Story, and that crazy physics platformer full custom creation sock-boy game as exclusives I actually want.
That's true, there are very, very few third-party exclusives now, due to the need to make more money to make back the high development costs of games on those platforms... that's definitely hurting the PS3. But really, it's mostly about momentum... people buy the consoles that are doing well, usually, and hold off on the ones not doing as well. And with the PS3's cheapest model now costing twice the amount of money of the X360's cheapest model...
Incidentally,

<img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/terminology.png">
It's about culture really, not location...
Actually I'm pretty sure it's because before discovering the new world, europe and asia was "the west" and "the east" and if you're anywhere in eurasia, those terms make sense. But if you go to the new world and still refer to the old locations by their old terms, as we apparently still do today, that flies out the window. So yeah I get your point, the idea is the culture of America grew up with the old terminology.
It's all a matter of debate, really... where do you draw the line, what's included in which grouping, etc... none of those are absolutes. The world is round, you can draw lines wherever you want and call them "east" and "west". Different people have different definitions of the areas and where they are -- does the "East" just include East and Southeast Asia and the eastern Pacific (except for Australia and New Zealand (and Hawaii, if you go that far west), or does it include the Middle East and/or Asian Russia too?

As for the Americas, we are, of course, both east and west of Europe, and both east and west of Asia... and we're a lot closer to Europe than Asia, and our culture and most of our people come from there. It'd be pretty odd to put the Americas in the East... I don't see why that would make any sense, my any measure cultural or geographic. The generally accepted east/west line on that side goes through the Pacific, as I said, leaving Australia, New Zealand, and the Americas on the "west" side. The line on the other side is better defined, with the Urals, Caucasus, Sinai (depending on where you put Africa), and various bodies of water forming the rest of the boundary.

Saying "Europe is east of me so it's the east" is just weird... things like the Western World and Eastern World have absolutely nothing to do with the exact location of any one person. Sorry, but in my opinion, that comic's just stupid really... there are legitimate reasons for some people to question the alignment of the world into an 'east' and 'west', as as I said the line gets very fuzzy in places particularly when you consider how in the modern world many ideas have traveled around the world from one culture to the next (though it must be noted, even the ancient Greeks saw a difference between their civilization (which they saw as more 'free') and more 'despotic' Asiatic (Middle Eastern) civilization, though European and Middle Eastern cultures have always closely interacted and have always been closely connected, unlike European and East or Southeast Asian ones), often changing as they go, but "that part of the world is east or west of my exact location so it's "East"? Stupid.

Look at this section of this article, it shows a whole bunch of different ways of separating the world into "worlds". Which one do you prefer, or do you have something else you like? :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_wor...efinitions
I think defining what's east and west based on the person is exactly the right way to go about it. I mean, that's what those directions are for. Position IS a relative constrcut after all.

And that comic is meant to illustrate exactly why it seems so weird. Seriously? You're looking at that, and you aren't getting it? If I look west and see "the east", it suddenly seems a little weird to me. Sure if I go west enough, I hit the east coast, but we're talking in relative terms, and what's closer and further from your own position. What better way to do it? I don't see a problem with people calling europe "the east", because it objectively IS east of us.

I suppose I could meet you halfway and add in an awkward "the east, as relative to the Americas".
Honestly, I just don't really understand your point. This post probably doesn't make much sense, and that's because the whole concept you are stating is confusing... it's not how we think of things! The idea that one person's location within a state determines cultural identity and geographic labels to that degree is just ludicrous.

And it's definitely not weird. Only that comic is, and that comic makes absolutely no sense. "When we talk about east and west politically we should use definitions based on where I in specific am standing"? That's got to be somewhere on the list of the stupidest things I have ever heard...

As I said before, "The East" and "The West" are historical and cultural constructs much more than they are geographical ones. They were defined long before anyone went around the world sailing west from Europe... China and India were east of Europe, so they were "The East". Europe was in the western part of the known continent based on the way Europeans drew maps, so they were "The West" (note that the Chinese likely had different definitions, given that they historically drew maps with south on the top instead of north; they simply considered themselves the center of the world, though, not a side of it.). Once defined definitions don't change... and when you look at a standard map, which draws the line down the middle of the Pacific, it still looks that way. That's probably why he used that odd "dividing it in the middle of Asia" style for that map, to show that Asia is also to our west...

But speaking from the east coast, China is on the other side of the world. There is a twelve hour time distance from here to there...

Quote:You're looking at that, and you aren't getting it? If I look west and see "the east", it suddenly seems a little weird to me.

I guess I can sort of see what you mean, but it's such a stupid point and is a completely weird way to look at things...

And besides, since the world is round, we are both east and west of every point on it. But it's history, culture, and nationality that determines this, not location. See: Australia and New Zealand, again. Western nations in the South Pacific.

There is one grain of truth to that image -- the closer you are to another culture, the more likely you are to be affected by it. That is, since Asia is a lot closer to the US West Coast than the East Coast, the west coast likely has a stronger Asian influence, and it's likely even stronger in Australia, for example. It's a Western nation, but in the Pacific... that has to mean things would be different than if it were in Europe. So sure, proximity can mean something. And America definitely believes it isn't quite like Europe -- we are also Western, but we aren't the same as Europe... and this developed because of our distance from them. So of course distance and location matter. But on the scale of "The West" and "The East", such things are relatively minor points.

Also, as Americans, we believe that these things are not absolutes... that is, that if you go to another place and try to change your identity to the identity of that place you can do it. Many cultures don't believe that... they believe an even more absolute version, that what you are at birth defines you forever. At least America has a much more generous definition, as is evidenced by our very open immigration laws.

Quote:I hit the east coast, but we're talking in relative terms, and what's closer and further from your own position.

Europe was "The West". Anywhere settled by Europeans thus became part of "The West" -- the Americas, Australia, New Zealand... Asia was "The East" (this particularly means East and Southeast Asia; the Middle East has always been in between). it really is as simple as that.

Quote:I don't see a problem with people calling europe "the east", because it objectively IS east of us.

What... huh? That'd be absurd...

Quote:I suppose I could meet you halfway and add in an awkward "the east, as relative to the Americas".

Only if you completely redefined the definitions of Western versus Eastern cultures and identities, which, somehow, I don't think you can do. :)
You kinda missed the part where this whole thing is a joke.

I'm not trying to redefine society at all. I'm just saying it's weird to refer to your east as "the west" and your west as "the east". The fact that those words have a social construct to them doesn't really factor into it. I'm just talking about east and west being directions too, the part you seem to have forgotten about. LAUGH!
It wasn't funny and doesn't make sense. :)
You seem to think that for something to be funny, you have to agree wholeheartedly with the concept on a serious level, and in all things that it would implicitely imply.
You have to agree that the concept of the joke is funny, yes... it isn't.
I need my camera back because right here would be the perfect place to post a picture of my wang with the words "SHUT THE FUCK UP" written down the length of it. Not that I couldn't add more words... it would just be... large print.