Tendo City

How cool would it be if the presidential and vice presidential nominees would debate like people at Tendo City? Eh?

Cheney: Ok listen you cock, you are SO wrong about that so shut your fuck!

Edwards: What did I just say? You're not even listening to me, so suck my dick!

Cheney: Bite me, asshole!

I actually think it was closer than before; I have a lot more respect for Cheney than before. He's more charismatic than I'd thought, he did well in his answers and his sly remarks. I don't dislike Edwards as much as Kerry.

I wasn't talking about who "won", I was talking about how boring it was.

The VP debate was actually more exciting than than the Presidential debate I thought.

Edwards: Halliburton.

Cheney: OH THAT IS IT!! *jumps on Edwards and beats him up*

Nah, at least with the presidential debate we had Bush fumbling his words all of the time. I always enjoy seeing that. :D

You would. *coughliberalcough*

...

...

Sorry.

So many liberals, bashing Bush not for his politics, but for his poor oratory skills. That's like me bashing Kerry for havng a face not unlike that of a horse; or a sunken-cheeked zombie.
Hey--that's good; I'm going to start using that against him!! :evilha:

Yes, only liberals think that Bush talks like an idiot.

*coughblindconservativecough*

To tell you the truth I think it's sad that Bush and Kerry are our only choices for president of this country. One's an "everyman retard" and the other is yet another dull, lifeless democrat. Are these two people really the only human beings alive in this country good enough to lead us? I think that shows how fucked up our political system is.

I thought it was an okay debate... not the best ever but decent. Both of them did fine. Probably the biggest thing coloring it is how I really don't like Edwards... I can't stand Cheney of course but as far as major Democrats go Edwards is low on my list.

Bush did a lot better in his interview with Bill O'Reilly than in his debate with Kerry. The difference was huge. Bush is nowhere near as stupid as come's off sometimes, he's just not a very good public speaker or debater.

Bush did a good job in his interview with O'Reilly because O'Reilly never threw him any tough questions. It was all questions that Bush could easily knock out of the park, and O'Reilly would even answer some of the questions. Like when he asked about the "Mission Accomplished" banner, and answered the question before Bush even had a chance to respond.

Oh come on, are you trying to say that Bill "Fair and Balanced" O'Reilly would do something like that?

Quote:Bush did a lot better in his interview with Bill O'Reilly than in his debate with Kerry. The difference was huge. Bush is nowhere near as stupid as come's off sometimes, he's just not a very good public speaker or debater.

Oh he's a master debater! Hahaha, get it??


Arthur: ...what..

I would've liked to hear Cheney tell Edwards to go fuck himself. That would've been cool. :D

Whatever. You guys might not like O'Reilly, but think he makes a lot of sense most of the time AND I enjoyed his interview with the president. So kiss off, punks!

Btw, I heard that John Kerry wants to eat your children. That's right. Children. Do you a child-eater as president? I know I don't.

O'Reilly is what you call a "total jerk". I'm not sure how anyone can't see that. He constantly belittles everyone that goes on his show, refuses to acknowledge any good points the other person made (he just calls them an idiot) and even after saying "I'll let you have the last word", he just interrupts them in the middle of it to say "that's stupid, YOU are stupid". He reminds me of someone actually...

In general, scientists avoid this guy because he just won't let logic through. Someone there to show the moon landing happened would most likely be attacked constantly, not able to get any points out, and even after the guy somehow manages to get in enough words to proove each and every little point the conspiracy theorists have wrong, he's say "well you gotta admit it's at least questionable", which if the guy had listened he'd see that if every single point the conspiracy theorists have is shown wrong, then it's NOT questionable any more is it.

He's a stubborn jackarse.

Hey that's insulting being compared to O'Reilly! The guy is an ass. Much like yourself. Except that O'Reilly doesn't run away from debates and cover his ears when people are trying to speak to him. So I guess you're more like O'Reilly if he were an immature little baby. Who stank. Like poo.

Bill O'Reilly > All you liberal wankers

Or

Strawberry cheesecake > Bill O'Reilly + all you liberal wankers

And quite frankly, I can go either way on this.

Bill O'Reilly is dumb! Take off those radical conservative goggles for a moment and you'll realize it!

*takes of goggles* Okay, now all I can see is a big orange blob...wait I think that's the sun. *looks away from the sun* Well, this is just great! Now I can't see ANYTHING!! *crashes into a tree* How did that happen?!

Bo Jackson says: Keep your eye on the ball, kids! Drink your orange juice! And buy my golfballs while you're at it! Arthur, show them my golfballs.

Arthur: ...what..

Arthur: What are you talking?! These things?! They're not golfballs! They're pieces of paper that you wadded up!

Bo Jackson: No, they're golfballs.

Arthur: ...

Bo Jackson: ...

Arthur: Alright, they're golfballs.

Bo Jackson: *drinks orange juice*

Bo Jackson is the best.

He's a great American hero.

Even greater than "The Greatest American Hero"!!

Bill O'reilly is a pompous jerk. Not because his bias is reflected with the way he treats certain guests, and not because he tries to cover it up by pretending to be fair and balanced by telling a guest whose opinion differs from his that he respects his opinion, and then he will agree on some irrelevant issue with that guest to make it appear that things are balanced. No. The reason O'reilly is such a jerk is because he keeps sexually harassing Conan O'brien over the telephone. I find it very O'fending.